top of page

How Do You Challenge a Client in Person-Centred Counselling?

Writer: Ben Jackson
Ben Jackson
11m
5 min read

You challenge a client in person-centred counselling by offering something back to them as an invitation, not a verdict.


A counsellor listens and takes notes while a client talks.


A good challenge asks the client to look again at how they see something, in their own words, without the counsellor telling them they're wrong. Most of the time the challenge is subtle enough that the client barely registers it as one.


When students first hear the word, they picture confrontation. Someone disagreeing. Someone saying "you're wrong". That isn't the challenge person-centred work asks of you.


What challenge means in person-centred terms


A person-centred challenge is non-combative. You bring something into the conversation that invites the client to re-examine how they're seeing a situation, or to look further into themselves. You offer it. You don't insist on it.


Take a client who says, "I'm feeling sad." You have a choice. Accept the word and move on, or ask, "In what way are you feeling sad?" The second response is a challenge. You decline to assume you know what sad means to this person. Something as simple as "When you said that, I wondered what it meant to you" does the same job.


The aim is to understand how this person experiences their world, in their own language, and what they believe to be true.


Challenge shows up where you least expect it


Some of the strongest challenges in counselling don't look like challenges at all.


Receiving empathy is one. For some clients, kindness, consideration and thoughtfulness are alien. Genuinely alien. Being offered them asks the client to entertain the idea they have worth, and they deserve that generosity. For someone who has never believed this about themselves, being understood is a challenge in itself.


The boundaries of the session are another. Telling a client the session finishes at 50 minutes or thereabouts is a challenge to someone who feels they should have more time, or that time with you should be endless.


Challenge exists in many forms. The obvious ones, "I disagree" or "you're wrong", are rarely the ones doing the work.


Where students go wrong in skills practice


Students bring the version of challenge they use everywhere else in life. Be direct. Have an opinion. Disagree. In skills practice, the word challenge feels like permission to bring all of those opinions into the conversation.


Other students go the opposite way. They hear challenge as confrontation, decide they don't want to impose a different point of view, and step away from challenging altogether. Both counsellor and client often expect a challenge to turn into conflict.


The mistakes follow from there. A challenge becomes a way to undermine the client's thinking and impose your own. Advice giving creeps in, and advice is a challenge of its own kind. You are challenging the client's autonomy, agency and self-direction by telling them what to do.


Why questions are another trap. "Why do you say that?" asks the client to justify an opinion. Less curiosity, more demand.


At the gentle end, the challenge is too forthright. At the extreme, the challenge undermines the person's autonomy.


What a challenge sounds like when it lands


The challenges that land best are often the lightest. One example from practice was a simple observation: "You've said this over here, and you've also said this over here. I'm wondering if those feel like they're pushing against each other, or pulling apart."


Nothing complicated. No interpretation. You draw attention to two things the client has said and wonder how they connect. The client reflected and began examining what was going on for them. The self-inquiry and self-discovery came from the client, not the counsellor.


You are bringing your own confusion into the room, and confusion is a good place to be. Greater clarity grows out of confusion, and the client does the clarifying.


Your language tells you a lot about whose agenda you're following. Open, general phrases such as "How are you seeing this?" keep you in the client's world. When your questions get specific, check what's driving them. Specific questions often reveal "I want to know this" or "I'm conflicted by this", and those belong to you. The line runs between deconstructing the person and inviting their own curiosity and inquiry.


When a challenge doesn't land


Sometimes the client doesn't pick it up. Note that, leave it, and don't return to it.


Other times the client pulls back or becomes defensive. Rather than talking about the challenge, talk about the reaction. What's going on in this space between us? The shift in the room becomes the material of the conversation.


Then look at yourself. What was your motivation? What did you bring in that moment? Was some of it yours? Was the delivery clumsy? Everything is material, including your own part in it. What you don't do is press the point against a client who doesn't want to go any further.


If you avoid challenging altogether


If you hate confrontation and avoid challenge, you have found something worth examining.


Avoidance isn't neutral. You aren't imposing yourself directly by telling a client what they should or shouldn't do, but you are imposing your silence on them. The message underneath is: I won't challenge you, because challenging you makes me uncomfortable. Pushing a client's buttons because you feel uncomfortable comes from the same place. The discomfort is metabolised in a different way.


So ask yourself. What's going on for you around conflict? Where has conflict come up for you before? When did questioning something, or teasing out a different opinion, become a bad thing for you? Look at how you show up in the world, how your personal history informs this, and how you relate to people in general. Notice which peers you find easier to challenge than others.


This is the work. Understanding yourself better is how you stop this difficulty limiting you as a counsellor.


Frequently Asked Questions


What is challenging in person-centred counselling?


Challenging in person-centred counselling means offering something back to the client as an invitation to look again at how they see a situation. A good challenge is often subtle, such as asking what a word means to the client.


Is challenging a client the same as confronting them?


No. Confrontation imposes the counsellor's view, while a person-centred challenge invites the client's own inquiry. Advice giving and why questions often slip into confrontation, because they ask the client to justify themselves or follow your direction.


What should a counsellor do if a client reacts badly to a challenge?


Notice the reaction and explore it with the client instead of defending the challenge. If the client doesn't pick the challenge up, leave it. Afterwards, reflect on your own motivation.


At The School of Counselling, we deliver CPCAB-accredited Level 2 and Level 3 counselling training online via Zoom, and a Level 4 Diploma in Therapeutic Counselling in person at monthly weekend intensives with monthly online lessons. Our courses are built around skills practice where you learn to offer challenge as an invitation, and to examine what gets in the way when you hold back. Find out more at schoolofcounselling.com.

 
 
bottom of page